Politically homeless

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Posted on 5:06 AM by Unknown

Old devils


This blog has long been down on Alby Schultz and Bill Heffernan. With this, the idea that they might make life hard for politicians with more guts and brains than they do would be genuinely astonishing unless you understood where they came from. The whole culture of modern political parties depends on bullying, now that policy is too hard. Civilised disagreements can only be had over impersonal matters; when ego fills the void where substantive issues were, folks are gonna get hurt and those who limp away shrieking are confused with those who give up in disgust.

Labor started it with the idea that caucus decisions could not be departed from, and the culture of the 'rat' for the freethinker who slipped the surly bonds of backroom fixers. The Liberals used to be a lot more subtle in a private school-fragging way until Howard instituted the full Führerprinzip. It's not just the majors: the Democrats did a nice line in passive-aggressive control learned in staffrooms across the country, and those Greens who came out of the various communist organisations love a good pogrom; they can't measure their own progress by trees saved etc., there must be self-criticism sessions for fifth columnists.

Peter Debnam was a big fan of tough dumb campaigning and look where it got him: John Hewson without the charisma. They don't see the link between poor campaigning and poor electoral outcomes. Schultz and Heffernan are frustrated that young Abbott is blowing their last chance, and even more so that he's not consulting them. They don't understand that they are making a Coalition government less likely, not more so; they don't understand why anyone would think that way.

Now you can see why election ad campaigns are so negative - bullying works internally, it has to work on those who are so wishy-washy they can't get involved. If anyone within that party had any misgivings whether or not they'd work, would they speak up? On what basis would anyone kybosh a dull and negative campaign? Who can you persuade that such campaigns don't work, and what proof would be accepted?
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in boofheads, nsw, rightwing intellectual failure, split decision '10 | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home
View mobile version

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • The most important issue of the week, part one
    The most important issue of last week was the release of the Gonski Report into school education funding . Yes it was. Asylum-seekers are fe...
  • (no title)
    Dedication to non-stories The next time you hear professional journalists describe themselves as a "fourth estate" and get all huf...
  • Gillard and the Labor leadership
    I've had this post under development for days, mainly because I have wanted to stay out of internal Labor politics. On one level the Gil...
  • (no title)
    Spearhead The term "spearhead" used to really annoy me, until I realised how revealing it is of those who use it. For a start, ...
  • (no title)
    Kia kaha Kia kaha , Christchurch! People proud of their dullness, hardiness and sense Of place find it hard to be told that You can't go...
  • (no title)
    Denial is not a river in Egypt In July 1789, as everybody knows, there was no Twitter, no al Jazeera, no David Burchill , although there was...
  • Advertise your own irrelevance
    Dear Mr Hywood, My name's Geoff Strong*. I'm employed as a journalist with The Age , which is a newspaper in Melbourne. I'm redu...
  • (no title)
    Johnny Panic The selection of John Robertson as NSW ALP leader shows how committed they are to staying dysfunctional, on a number of levels....
  • (no title)
    The (self-)destruction of Tony Abbott begins Over many years, Abbott has constructed an appearance of strength in his intellect and sense of...
  • (no title)
    What's wrong with newspapers, Part I The good news is that there are only two things really wrong with newspapers today, and with Fairfa...

Categories

  • 24hnc (5)
  • Aborigines (9)
  • adelaide (4)
  • annabelcrabb (10)
  • art (1)
  • bennelong (8)
  • bloody farmers (19)
  • boofheads (81)
  • childcare (2)
  • chrisberg (4)
  • church 'n' state (9)
  • civil liberties reconsidered (22)
  • corruption (21)
  • counterfactuals (20)
  • defence (2)
  • democrats (1)
  • economics (15)
  • education (18)
  • energy (4)
  • environment (37)
  • fairfax (12)
  • federation (16)
  • foreigners (62)
  • frydenberg (16)
  • gfc (13)
  • grattan (17)
  • greens (4)
  • gregsheridan (11)
  • gutlessness (145)
  • head of state (2)
  • health (9)
  • hendo (4)
  • history abuse (25)
  • hitchens (1)
  • ict (21)
  • imresaluszinsky (4)
  • infrastructure (32)
  • innovation (24)
  • journosphere (80)
  • katharinemurphy (12)
  • koutsoukis (1)
  • kulturkrieg (29)
  • laura norder (15)
  • life and death (15)
  • malcolmcolless (1)
  • milney (8)
  • moderates (16)
  • murdoch (6)
  • nikisavva (10)
  • nsw (49)
  • paulhowes (5)
  • pell (2)
  • politics of information (14)
  • posthoward (47)
  • predictions (56)
  • press gallery groupthink (130)
  • pvo (14)
  • queensland (20)
  • refugees (19)
  • regulators (18)
  • rightwing intellectual failure (242)
  • roskam (4)
  • rudd-gillard (7)
  • senate (8)
  • soccer (2)
  • split decision '10 (23)
  • sport (1)
  • straw man work (38)
  • sussexstreetbums (30)
  • tax (20)
  • tonyabbott (135)
  • uk (2)
  • vehicle industry donations (8)
  • victoria (10)
  • war (14)
  • wikileaks (3)
  • workchoices (16)
  • yeswoman (13)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (54)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (8)
  • ►  2012 (102)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (13)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ►  2011 (125)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (10)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (12)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (10)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ▼  2010 (115)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ▼  August (16)
      • Old devilsThis blog has long been down on Alby Sch...
      • CareeringThis article from Andrew West has a lot o...
      • Stand up, JoeThe KOWs want party costings to be sl...
      • Spring cleaningThe Liberals should have cleared ou...
      • Lenore Taylor gets the Michelle Grattan Prize for ...
      • Three reasons why the Liberals can't form governme...
      • A piece of incredible unfortunatenessTwo themes th...
      • How I voted 2010I voted in Bennelong, using the fo...
      • Cracks appearIf Peter Hartcher is right and people...
      • RailroadedYesterday, the Federal government announ...
      • Out of puffSean Carney's piece today highlights wh...
      • Why the Coalition telecommunications policy has fa...
      • A firm grasp of the wrong end of the stickKatharin...
      • Cheering for the underdogLabor have stumbled and b...
      • No news is bad newsThis is great, and there should...
      • Where's Johnny?Bob Hawke turned up at a shopping c...
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (13)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2009 (94)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (9)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (12)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2008 (10)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (3)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile